William H. Lawson |

Profile
Contact Attorney

Law Offices of William H. Lawson

Honolulu, Hawaii – but serving all islands in the State of Hawai’i

Mr. Lawson, an attorney in the State of Hawaii, is a Christian personal injury attorney in the state of Hawaii and has been for over 30 years. He is a 1977 graduate of Stanford Law School at Stanford University in Palo Alto, California. For more than 30 years he has represented and continues to represent people whose loved ones have been the victim of serious injuries or wrongful death in an accident which has some connection to Hawaii (eg. one or more of the parties is based in Hawaii, the accident occurred in Hawaii or one or more of the parties does business in Hawaii).

Law Offices of William H. Lawson

Honolulu, Hawaii – but serving all islands in the State of Hawai’i

As a personal injury attorney in the state of Hawaii, Mr. Lawson has worked with both local and mainland firms as co-counsel. Mr. Lawson has worked side-by-side with other firms and also in a supervisory capacity using his many years of experience to guide the client to the appropriate resources. We have used arbitration, mediation and litigation – each at its proper time. Accident Lawyer Hawaii provides legal services in each area of need for a particular case – sometimes by bringing in other lawyers and law firms to assist us on the claims. Over the years Mr. Lawson has provided the individual communications and responsive contact that assures a client of personal attention while still providing high quality legal services even in complex and difficult cases.

William H. Lawson- a Hawaii personal injury lawyer- handles severe injuries, wrongful death, fatalities and other serious injuries arising out of car accidents (MVAs- motor vehicle accidents- trucks, buses, motorcycles, mopeds, etc); pedestrian accidents; construction accidents; serious falls; certain premises liability accidents; accidents resulting from defective products (dangerous products liability claims); boating and maritime accidents (accidents in the ocean or at sea); claims against insurance companies and other claims. Although there is no certification for specialization as a trial lawyer under Hawaii law, Mr. Lawson’s law practice has strongly emphasized trial related work.

“With Your Counsel, You Will Guide Me.” – Ps. 73:24

Born: in the 1950s in Champaign, Illinois

Graduated from:
• Stanford Law School in Stanford, California in 1977
• Trinity College in Hartford, Connecticut in 1974
• St. Albans School in Washington, D.C. in 1970
• Attended Iolani School in Honolulu, Hawaii 1967-1968
Honors:
• Phi Beta Kappa
• Cum Laude
• Sigma Pi Sigma (an honorary physics society)
Admitted to the bar of:
• U.S. Supreme Court 1979
• Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals 1979
• U.S. District Court for the 9th Circuit 1977
• Hawaii 1977
Private practice of law in the State of Hawaii since 1977 for:
• William H. Lawson, Attorney at Law (1979 to date)
• Cades, Schutte, Fleming & Wright (1977-1979)
Memberships in:
• Hawaii State Bar Association
• Consumer Lawyers of Hawaii (formerly the Association of Plaintiffs’ Lawyers of Hawaii)
• American Bar Association
• American Trial Lawyers Association
• National Lawyers Association
• Christian Lawyers Society
• Stanford Alumni Association
Practice areas:
• Personal injury and Tort Law
• Car Accidents and other Motor Vehicle Accidents
• Products Liability
• Premises Liability
• Insurance Disputes
• Admiralty
• Professional Malpractice (medical malpractice)
• Civil litigation
• Alternative Dispute Resolution

Although we are located in Hawaii, we have assisted on Hawaii matters for clients and co-counsel from all over the United States and many parts of the world. To date we have represented residents of: Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Montana, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia & Wisconsin as well as Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Guam, Micronesia & the Phillipines. We do not publish a list of representative clients due to privacy concerns.

Opening Hours

Monday

Tuesday

Wednesday

Thursday

Friday

Saturday

Sunday

Testimonials

Publishing ...

Your testimonial has been successfully sent

Please fill out all fields

DETAILS

1 CommentComment on Facebook

To the Honorable Court Comes now the Defendant, an American-born citizen, invoking the full protection of the United States Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and all applicable federal and state civil rights statutes. The Defendant respectfully moves this Court for immediate dismissal of all charges, full restitution, and the initiation of a federal inquiry into the unlawful alteration of arrest records ~ acts that constitute a direct assault on constitutional law, civil rights, and the integrity of the American justice system. I. Statement of Facts The Defendant’s arrest records were unlawfully altered, amended, or falsified on multiple occasions. Up to nine (9) separate instances ~ without judicial authorization, due process, or the Defendant’s knowledge or consent. These alterations occurred within official courthouse systems, representing a deliberate and systemic act of tampering with public records, a felony under both federal and state law. This misconduct deprived the Defendant of liberty, reputation, and due process, violating the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. Neither the Defendant nor counsel was ever permitted to appear before a judge. The entire judicial process was subverted, replaced by falsified documentation and administrative deceit. These actions were not clerical errors. They were calculated violations . A coordinated effort to manipulate the record, obstruct justice, and conceal misconduct. The Defendant asserts that this pattern of falsification constitutes a constitutional crisis, undermining the rule of law and eroding public trust in the judiciary. II. Constitutional and Statutory Violations A. Fourth Amendment The unlawful alteration of arrest records constitutes an unreasonable seizure of identity and liberty. By fabricating or distorting the factual basis of prior proceedings, state actors effectively seized the Defendant’s legal identity and replaced it with a false narrative, violating the right to be secure in person and record. B. Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments (Due Process and Equal Protection) The Defendant was denied procedural due process when records were altered without notice, hearing, or opportunity to contest. Equal protection was violated through selective and discriminatory treatment. These acts deprived the Defendant of the fundamental fairness guaranteed by the Constitution and created a two-tiered system of justice . One for the protected, and one for the silenced. C. Sixth Amendment The Defendant’s right to a fair trial and accurate recordkeeping was destroyed. Altered records directly affect defense strategy, credibility, and sentencing considerations. The falsification of judicial documents renders any subsequent proceedings constitutionally void. D. Civil Rights Statutes Under 42 U.S.C. §1983, any person acting under color of law who deprives another of constitutional rights is liable for damages. The Defendant reserves the right to pursue civil action against all responsible parties, including law enforcement agencies, clerks, prosecutors, and any third parties complicit in the falsification of records. Each alteration constitutes a separate and actionable violation of civil rights. III. Legal Argument for Dismissal and Restitution Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine Any evidence derived from falsified or altered records is inadmissible. The foundation of the prosecution’s case is therefore tainted and must be dismissed in its entirety. The doctrine mandates exclusion of all evidence obtained through unlawful means, ensuring that justice is not built upon corruption. Violation of Brady v. Maryland (373 U.S. 83, 1963) The suppression or alteration of exculpatory evidence constitutes prosecutorial misconduct and mandates dismissal. By concealing or distorting material facts, the prosecution deprived the Defendant of a fair opportunity to present a complete defense. Judicial Integrity and Public Trust The Court has an inherent duty to preserve the integrity of its records. Allowing prosecution to proceed on falsified documentation undermines the rule of law and erodes public confidence in the justice system. The judiciary must act decisively to correct and condemn such violations to maintain its legitimacy and moral authority. IV. Damages and Valuation of Harm The Defendant seeks restitution and damages commensurate with the magnitude of the constitutional violations and the systemic corruption exposed. The following categories of harm justify a valuation exceeding $2.5 billion USD, reflecting both compensatory and punitive damages: Loss of Liberty and Due Process ~ The unlawful deprivation of freedom and denial of judicial access. Reputational and Emotional Harm ~ Two decades of stigma, psychological trauma, and social isolation. Economic and Opportunity Loss ~ Destruction of career, income potential, and professional standing. Punitive Damages ~ To punish and deter future misconduct by state actors and institutions. Institutional Accountability ~ Damages for systemic corruption, falsification of public records, and erosion of public trust. Public Interest Damages ~ Compensation for the broader societal harm caused by the corruption of judicial integrity. This case represents not merely a personal injury, but a national constitutional breach — a precedent that, if left unpunished, endangers every citizen’s right to due process and equal protection under the law. V. Relief Sought The Defendant respectfully requests: Immediate dismissal of all charges with prejudice. Expungement of all falsified or altered records. Independent forensic audit of all arrest and court records associated with the Defendant. Referral to the Department of Justice Civil Rights Division for investigation into systemic misconduct. Award of compensatory and punitive damages totaling $2.5 billion USD, subject to adjustment upon discovery. Public acknowledgment of wrongdoing and formal correction of all judicial records. VI. Conclusion The Defendant stands as a sovereign American citizen whose rights were not merely violated but erased. The unlawful alteration of official records is not a clerical mistake. It is a constitutional crime. It is the theft of truth, the erasure of identity, and the corruption of the very system sworn to protect it. Justice demands not only dismissal but restitution, reform, and accountability. The Constitution cannot defend itself; it relies on citizens and courts of conscience to do so. This motion is not a plea for mercy . It is a demand for justice, truth, and the restoration of the rule of law. Respectfully submitted, Sign: ~ {Jeremy H. Hars} ~

William H. Lawson

Profile
Contact Attorney

Related