Profile
Contact Attorney

Award-winning South Georgia Personal Injury Lawyer

Attorney J.L. King, II, is one of the most experienced civil trial lawyers in the South Georgia area and also The King Firm’s founding attorney. He is currently licensed to practice law in Florida as well as Georgia. Mr. King owns an M.B.A. from Murray State University and earned his J.D. from the University of Georgia in 2005.

Mr. King was an insurance defense attorney prior to founding The King Firm. He uses this experience on a daily basis to provide more effective personal injury legal representation to his clients. Insurance companies cannot take advantage of Mr. King’s clients because he understands how they operate and uses that knowledge to his advantage.

Do not overlook The King Firm if you need personal injury representation in South Georgia. Reach out today for a free consultation.

Helping Victims of All Types of Personal Injuries in South Georgia

The King Firm has collected tens of millions of dollars for deserving personal injury victims throughout South Georgia. Mr. King has 16 years of legal experience and has seen personal injury cases of all types. Here are just a… Read More

Award-winning South Georgia Personal Injury Lawyer

Do not overlook The King Firm if you need personal injury representation in South Georgia. Reach out today for a free consultation.

Helping Victims of All Types of Personal Injuries in South Georgia

Contact The King Firm today for help with your case.

A Personal Touch

Attorney King and the rest of the legal team with The King Firm aim to get to know each of their clients on a personal level. They believe that this personal touch allows them to provide more effective and meaningful representation. When you hire The King Firm, you won’t just be a number on a spreadsheet as you might be at a larger firm or with an insurance company.

The King Firm will keep you apprised of your case’s progress from the beginning. You’ll be able to speak with the team at your convenience, and you won’t be left in the dark. Instead, you’ll be treated like family.

South Georgia Born and Bred

Attorney King lives in Tifton, Georgia, with his wife and two children. Mr. King cares about South Georgia as much as anyone, which is one reason why he founded The King Firm. Super Lawyers has placed Mr. King on its Rising Stars list for the State of Georgia three times.

With offices in Tifton and Griffin, GA, The King Firm is well situated to assist personal injury victims throughout the South Georgia area. If you’re ready to get started, contact Mr. King and the rest of The King Firm today for a free consultation.

Tifton Office:
1603 U.S Hwy 41
Tifton, GA 31794
(229) 386-1376

Griffin Office:
3317 Fayetteville Rd.,
Griffin, GA 30223
(404) 567-4546

Opening Hours

Monday

Tuesday

Wednesday

Thursday

Friday

Saturday

Sunday

Testimonials

Publishing ...

Your testimonial has been successfully sent

Please fill out all fields

DETAILS

1 CommentComment on Facebook

To the Honorable Court Comes now the Defendant, an American-born citizen, invoking the full protection of the United States Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and all applicable federal and state civil rights statutes. The Defendant respectfully moves this Court for immediate dismissal of all charges, full restitution, and the initiation of a federal inquiry into the unlawful alteration of arrest records ~ acts that constitute a direct assault on constitutional law, civil rights, and the integrity of the American justice system. I. Statement of Facts The Defendant’s arrest records were unlawfully altered, amended, or falsified on multiple occasions. Up to nine (9) separate instances ~ without judicial authorization, due process, or the Defendant’s knowledge or consent. These alterations occurred within official courthouse systems, representing a deliberate and systemic act of tampering with public records, a felony under both federal and state law. This misconduct deprived the Defendant of liberty, reputation, and due process, violating the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. Neither the Defendant nor counsel was ever permitted to appear before a judge. The entire judicial process was subverted, replaced by falsified documentation and administrative deceit. These actions were not clerical errors. They were calculated violations . A coordinated effort to manipulate the record, obstruct justice, and conceal misconduct. The Defendant asserts that this pattern of falsification constitutes a constitutional crisis, undermining the rule of law and eroding public trust in the judiciary. II. Constitutional and Statutory Violations A. Fourth Amendment The unlawful alteration of arrest records constitutes an unreasonable seizure of identity and liberty. By fabricating or distorting the factual basis of prior proceedings, state actors effectively seized the Defendant’s legal identity and replaced it with a false narrative, violating the right to be secure in person and record. B. Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments (Due Process and Equal Protection) The Defendant was denied procedural due process when records were altered without notice, hearing, or opportunity to contest. Equal protection was violated through selective and discriminatory treatment. These acts deprived the Defendant of the fundamental fairness guaranteed by the Constitution and created a two-tiered system of justice . One for the protected, and one for the silenced. C. Sixth Amendment The Defendant’s right to a fair trial and accurate recordkeeping was destroyed. Altered records directly affect defense strategy, credibility, and sentencing considerations. The falsification of judicial documents renders any subsequent proceedings constitutionally void. D. Civil Rights Statutes Under 42 U.S.C. §1983, any person acting under color of law who deprives another of constitutional rights is liable for damages. The Defendant reserves the right to pursue civil action against all responsible parties, including law enforcement agencies, clerks, prosecutors, and any third parties complicit in the falsification of records. Each alteration constitutes a separate and actionable violation of civil rights. III. Legal Argument for Dismissal and Restitution Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine Any evidence derived from falsified or altered records is inadmissible. The foundation of the prosecution’s case is therefore tainted and must be dismissed in its entirety. The doctrine mandates exclusion of all evidence obtained through unlawful means, ensuring that justice is not built upon corruption. Violation of Brady v. Maryland (373 U.S. 83, 1963) The suppression or alteration of exculpatory evidence constitutes prosecutorial misconduct and mandates dismissal. By concealing or distorting material facts, the prosecution deprived the Defendant of a fair opportunity to present a complete defense. Judicial Integrity and Public Trust The Court has an inherent duty to preserve the integrity of its records. Allowing prosecution to proceed on falsified documentation undermines the rule of law and erodes public confidence in the justice system. The judiciary must act decisively to correct and condemn such violations to maintain its legitimacy and moral authority. IV. Damages and Valuation of Harm The Defendant seeks restitution and damages commensurate with the magnitude of the constitutional violations and the systemic corruption exposed. The following categories of harm justify a valuation exceeding $2.5 billion USD, reflecting both compensatory and punitive damages: Loss of Liberty and Due Process ~ The unlawful deprivation of freedom and denial of judicial access. Reputational and Emotional Harm ~ Two decades of stigma, psychological trauma, and social isolation. Economic and Opportunity Loss ~ Destruction of career, income potential, and professional standing. Punitive Damages ~ To punish and deter future misconduct by state actors and institutions. Institutional Accountability ~ Damages for systemic corruption, falsification of public records, and erosion of public trust. Public Interest Damages ~ Compensation for the broader societal harm caused by the corruption of judicial integrity. This case represents not merely a personal injury, but a national constitutional breach — a precedent that, if left unpunished, endangers every citizen’s right to due process and equal protection under the law. V. Relief Sought The Defendant respectfully requests: Immediate dismissal of all charges with prejudice. Expungement of all falsified or altered records. Independent forensic audit of all arrest and court records associated with the Defendant. Referral to the Department of Justice Civil Rights Division for investigation into systemic misconduct. Award of compensatory and punitive damages totaling $2.5 billion USD, subject to adjustment upon discovery. Public acknowledgment of wrongdoing and formal correction of all judicial records. VI. Conclusion The Defendant stands as a sovereign American citizen whose rights were not merely violated but erased. The unlawful alteration of official records is not a clerical mistake. It is a constitutional crime. It is the theft of truth, the erasure of identity, and the corruption of the very system sworn to protect it. Justice demands not only dismissal but restitution, reform, and accountability. The Constitution cannot defend itself; it relies on citizens and courts of conscience to do so. This motion is not a plea for mercy . It is a demand for justice, truth, and the restoration of the rule of law. Respectfully submitted, Sign: ~ {Jeremy H. Hars} ~

J.L. King, II Personal Injury Lawyer | The King Firm

Profile
Contact Attorney

Award-winning South Georgia Personal Injury Lawyer

Award-winning South Georgia Personal Injury Lawyer

Related