Kevin L. Locklin |

Profile

Law and litigation have long been passions of Mr. Locklin. While attending George Mason University School of Law, he worked at the Department of Justice on a special anti-trust task force. During this time, Mr. Locklin was honored to receive the Special Achievement Award by Attorney General Benjamin Civiletti, who served as the United States Attorney General from 1979-1981. At George Mason, Mr. Locklin was a member of the Law Review and had an article published regarding a complex issue of ant-trust law. Upon graduating from law school, Mr. Locklin served two clerkships; first for the Judges of the Thirty First Judicial Circuit in Prince William County, Virginia, and then for Oren Lewis, United States District Court Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division.

Mr. Locklin’s efforts would ultimately lead to a partnership in the law firm of Slenker, Brandt, Jennings and Johnston. During this time, he was accepted into the International Association of Defense Attorneys, served as president of the Northern Virginia Defense Attorneys and on the VADA Board of Governors.

In 1991, Mr. Locklin opened what would become a thriving plaintiff’s practice in Manassas, VA. The practice maintained its vitality (achieving great results both through settlements… Read More

In 1991, Mr. Locklin opened what would become a thriving plaintiff’s practice in Manassas, VA. The practice maintained its vitality (achieving great results both through settlements and court room verdicts) even while Mr. Locklin raised his daughter as a single parent and coached her in a variety of sports. Good fortune and hard work have resulted in the designation of Mr. Locklin among those attorneys recognized in Best Lawyers of America, Super Lawyers of Virginia and D.C. American Trial Lawyers Association Top 100 Trial Lawyers, and Top Lawyers in Northern Virginia.

Mr. Locklin is also AV rated by Martindale-Hubbell. Mr. Locklin maintains great faith in our judicial system and believes that every client deserves a fair result. Mr. Locklin has garnered these achievements essentially as a sole practitioner. His associate focuses on much needed guidance and counsel associated with Social Security Disability and Worker’s Compensation.

An example of Mr. Locklin’s integrity and compassion is his refusal to accept a fee on children’s cases and the fact that he often reduces his fee for clients that are in dire financial situations. His work ethic, integrity and achievements epitomize the definition of a trial attorney.

Testimonials

Publishing ...

Your testimonial has been successfully sent

Please fill out all fields

DETAILS

1 CommentComment on Facebook

To the Honorable Court Comes now the Defendant, an American-born citizen, invoking the full protection of the United States Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and all applicable federal and state civil rights statutes. The Defendant respectfully moves this Court for immediate dismissal of all charges, full restitution, and the initiation of a federal inquiry into the unlawful alteration of arrest records ~ acts that constitute a direct assault on constitutional law, civil rights, and the integrity of the American justice system. I. Statement of Facts The Defendant’s arrest records were unlawfully altered, amended, or falsified on multiple occasions. Up to nine (9) separate instances ~ without judicial authorization, due process, or the Defendant’s knowledge or consent. These alterations occurred within official courthouse systems, representing a deliberate and systemic act of tampering with public records, a felony under both federal and state law. This misconduct deprived the Defendant of liberty, reputation, and due process, violating the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. Neither the Defendant nor counsel was ever permitted to appear before a judge. The entire judicial process was subverted, replaced by falsified documentation and administrative deceit. These actions were not clerical errors. They were calculated violations . A coordinated effort to manipulate the record, obstruct justice, and conceal misconduct. The Defendant asserts that this pattern of falsification constitutes a constitutional crisis, undermining the rule of law and eroding public trust in the judiciary. II. Constitutional and Statutory Violations A. Fourth Amendment The unlawful alteration of arrest records constitutes an unreasonable seizure of identity and liberty. By fabricating or distorting the factual basis of prior proceedings, state actors effectively seized the Defendant’s legal identity and replaced it with a false narrative, violating the right to be secure in person and record. B. Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments (Due Process and Equal Protection) The Defendant was denied procedural due process when records were altered without notice, hearing, or opportunity to contest. Equal protection was violated through selective and discriminatory treatment. These acts deprived the Defendant of the fundamental fairness guaranteed by the Constitution and created a two-tiered system of justice . One for the protected, and one for the silenced. C. Sixth Amendment The Defendant’s right to a fair trial and accurate recordkeeping was destroyed. Altered records directly affect defense strategy, credibility, and sentencing considerations. The falsification of judicial documents renders any subsequent proceedings constitutionally void. D. Civil Rights Statutes Under 42 U.S.C. §1983, any person acting under color of law who deprives another of constitutional rights is liable for damages. The Defendant reserves the right to pursue civil action against all responsible parties, including law enforcement agencies, clerks, prosecutors, and any third parties complicit in the falsification of records. Each alteration constitutes a separate and actionable violation of civil rights. III. Legal Argument for Dismissal and Restitution Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine Any evidence derived from falsified or altered records is inadmissible. The foundation of the prosecution’s case is therefore tainted and must be dismissed in its entirety. The doctrine mandates exclusion of all evidence obtained through unlawful means, ensuring that justice is not built upon corruption. Violation of Brady v. Maryland (373 U.S. 83, 1963) The suppression or alteration of exculpatory evidence constitutes prosecutorial misconduct and mandates dismissal. By concealing or distorting material facts, the prosecution deprived the Defendant of a fair opportunity to present a complete defense. Judicial Integrity and Public Trust The Court has an inherent duty to preserve the integrity of its records. Allowing prosecution to proceed on falsified documentation undermines the rule of law and erodes public confidence in the justice system. The judiciary must act decisively to correct and condemn such violations to maintain its legitimacy and moral authority. IV. Damages and Valuation of Harm The Defendant seeks restitution and damages commensurate with the magnitude of the constitutional violations and the systemic corruption exposed. The following categories of harm justify a valuation exceeding $2.5 billion USD, reflecting both compensatory and punitive damages: Loss of Liberty and Due Process ~ The unlawful deprivation of freedom and denial of judicial access. Reputational and Emotional Harm ~ Two decades of stigma, psychological trauma, and social isolation. Economic and Opportunity Loss ~ Destruction of career, income potential, and professional standing. Punitive Damages ~ To punish and deter future misconduct by state actors and institutions. Institutional Accountability ~ Damages for systemic corruption, falsification of public records, and erosion of public trust. Public Interest Damages ~ Compensation for the broader societal harm caused by the corruption of judicial integrity. This case represents not merely a personal injury, but a national constitutional breach — a precedent that, if left unpunished, endangers every citizen’s right to due process and equal protection under the law. V. Relief Sought The Defendant respectfully requests: Immediate dismissal of all charges with prejudice. Expungement of all falsified or altered records. Independent forensic audit of all arrest and court records associated with the Defendant. Referral to the Department of Justice Civil Rights Division for investigation into systemic misconduct. Award of compensatory and punitive damages totaling $2.5 billion USD, subject to adjustment upon discovery. Public acknowledgment of wrongdoing and formal correction of all judicial records. VI. Conclusion The Defendant stands as a sovereign American citizen whose rights were not merely violated but erased. The unlawful alteration of official records is not a clerical mistake. It is a constitutional crime. It is the theft of truth, the erasure of identity, and the corruption of the very system sworn to protect it. Justice demands not only dismissal but restitution, reform, and accountability. The Constitution cannot defend itself; it relies on citizens and courts of conscience to do so. This motion is not a plea for mercy . It is a demand for justice, truth, and the restoration of the rule of law. Respectfully submitted, Sign: ~ {Jeremy H. Hars} ~

Kevin L. Locklin

Profile

Related

Testimonials

DETAILS

Press Releases

Newest Member

Matthew Trollinger

Recent Posts

Press Releases

Contact Us

Profile

Related

Address

Our Address:

Telephone:

Email:

Web:

Testimonials

DETAILS

Press Releases

Newest Member

Matthew Trollinger