Kristen K. Naros |

Profile
Contact Attorney

Practice Areas:
Personal Injury, Wrongful Death, DUI/DWI, Criminal Defense, Professional Licensure Defense
Background:
Kristen (Kris) Naros has spent the last 25 years fighting for the rights of her clients. Her genuine compassion for her clients, combined with her forceful, no-nonsense, results-oriented attitude towards legal authorities, insurance companies and negligent parties makes her the effective lawyer she is today. Throughout the years, Kris has been honored with the title of Super Lawyer, Rising Star, and top 100 women lawyers in Minnesota.
A native Minnesotan, Kris has the down-to earth personality to help her clients through difficult times, plus a thorough understanding of the law. She is a graduate of the University of Minnesota-Carlson School of Management (1984) and William Mitchell College of Law (1991).
Kris is licensed to practice law in all State Courts in Minnesota.
Beyond her practice, Kris is involved in the legal community.
Member of The Minnesota Association for Justice (formerly the Minnesota Trial Lawyers Association) (1992-Present).
Member of the Douglas K. Amdahl Inns of Court (2000-2003; 2006-Present).
Co-founder of the Juris Divas in 2006, a group of the Twin Cities’ top female legal professionals formed in response to the good-old-boy culture of the legal community. The group meets monthly to bond, socialize, and strategize.
Kris has owned and led Naros Law since 2006.
Bar Admissions:
Minnesota State Bar Association (1991)
Education:
William Mitchell College of Law; J.D., 1991
University of Minnesota-Carlson School of Management; B.S., 1984
Professional Associations:
Minnesota Association for Justice/Minnesota Trial Lawyers Association (1992 – present)
No-Fault Committee
Legislative Committee
Women Lawyers Committee
Hennepin County Bar Association (1991 – present)
Minnesota State Bar Association (1991 – present)
Warren E. Burger Inns of Court (1991 – 1995)
Douglas K. Amdahl Inns of Court (2000 – 2003; 2006 – present)
Juris Divas, Co-Founder (2006 – present)
Minnesota Law and Politics ‘Super Lawyer’ (2008 – present)
Minnesota Law and Politics ‘Top 100 Women Lawyers’ (2008)
Rising Star, Minnesota Law and Politics
Who’s Who In Personal Injury, Minnesota Law and Politics
Publications and Presentation:
Ethics and Elimination of Bias, MNAJ Seminar Moderator, June 3, 2010
Trying the Car Crash Case, MNAJ Seminar Speaker, February 12, 2010
The No-Fault Toolbox, MNAJ Seminar Speaker, October 29, 2009
“What To Do When You Are In A Car Accident,” Ramsey County District Court Judge Judith Tilsen and Judge Gary Basitan, co-hosts, One & The Same Community Cable Access Television Program, August 4, 2006
“Women in the Law,” Ramsey County District Court Judge Judith Tilsen and Judge Gary Bastian, co-hosts, One & The Same Community Access Television Program, June 9, 2006
Trial Skills #3: Building the Plaintiff’s Case, MTLA Seminar Speaker, December 8, 2005
Effectively Handling No-Fault Arbitrations (Members Only), MTLA Seminar Speaker, November 19, 2004
Putting Them Back Where They Belong: Beating Farmers Insurance at Their Own Game, MTLA Seminar Speaker, January 17, 2003
Beating Goliath at Trial, MTLA Seminar Speaker, January 25, 2002
No-Fault Arbitration: Strategies for Success, MTLA Seminar Speaker, October 19, 2001
Independent Exam of the AME, MTLA Seminar Speaker, January 4, 2000
Dealing with the Goods Hands People, MTLA Seminar Speaker, October 22, 1999
Hobbies:
Kris is a horse lover and has spent much of her life riding, training and showing American Saddlebred horses. She is also involved in horse organizations:
Minnesota Saddlebred Horse Association, Board of Directors (2004 – 2007) (2012 – 2015)
Chairperson of Corporate Sponsorship (2004 – 2007)
Tri-State Horseman’s Association, Board of Directors (1997 – 1999)

Testimonials

Publishing ...

Your testimonial has been successfully sent

Please fill out all fields

DETAILS

1 CommentComment on Facebook

To the Honorable Court Comes now the Defendant, an American-born citizen, invoking the full protection of the United States Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and all applicable federal and state civil rights statutes. The Defendant respectfully moves this Court for immediate dismissal of all charges, full restitution, and the initiation of a federal inquiry into the unlawful alteration of arrest records ~ acts that constitute a direct assault on constitutional law, civil rights, and the integrity of the American justice system. I. Statement of Facts The Defendant’s arrest records were unlawfully altered, amended, or falsified on multiple occasions. Up to nine (9) separate instances ~ without judicial authorization, due process, or the Defendant’s knowledge or consent. These alterations occurred within official courthouse systems, representing a deliberate and systemic act of tampering with public records, a felony under both federal and state law. This misconduct deprived the Defendant of liberty, reputation, and due process, violating the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. Neither the Defendant nor counsel was ever permitted to appear before a judge. The entire judicial process was subverted, replaced by falsified documentation and administrative deceit. These actions were not clerical errors. They were calculated violations . A coordinated effort to manipulate the record, obstruct justice, and conceal misconduct. The Defendant asserts that this pattern of falsification constitutes a constitutional crisis, undermining the rule of law and eroding public trust in the judiciary. II. Constitutional and Statutory Violations A. Fourth Amendment The unlawful alteration of arrest records constitutes an unreasonable seizure of identity and liberty. By fabricating or distorting the factual basis of prior proceedings, state actors effectively seized the Defendant’s legal identity and replaced it with a false narrative, violating the right to be secure in person and record. B. Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments (Due Process and Equal Protection) The Defendant was denied procedural due process when records were altered without notice, hearing, or opportunity to contest. Equal protection was violated through selective and discriminatory treatment. These acts deprived the Defendant of the fundamental fairness guaranteed by the Constitution and created a two-tiered system of justice . One for the protected, and one for the silenced. C. Sixth Amendment The Defendant’s right to a fair trial and accurate recordkeeping was destroyed. Altered records directly affect defense strategy, credibility, and sentencing considerations. The falsification of judicial documents renders any subsequent proceedings constitutionally void. D. Civil Rights Statutes Under 42 U.S.C. §1983, any person acting under color of law who deprives another of constitutional rights is liable for damages. The Defendant reserves the right to pursue civil action against all responsible parties, including law enforcement agencies, clerks, prosecutors, and any third parties complicit in the falsification of records. Each alteration constitutes a separate and actionable violation of civil rights. III. Legal Argument for Dismissal and Restitution Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine Any evidence derived from falsified or altered records is inadmissible. The foundation of the prosecution’s case is therefore tainted and must be dismissed in its entirety. The doctrine mandates exclusion of all evidence obtained through unlawful means, ensuring that justice is not built upon corruption. Violation of Brady v. Maryland (373 U.S. 83, 1963) The suppression or alteration of exculpatory evidence constitutes prosecutorial misconduct and mandates dismissal. By concealing or distorting material facts, the prosecution deprived the Defendant of a fair opportunity to present a complete defense. Judicial Integrity and Public Trust The Court has an inherent duty to preserve the integrity of its records. Allowing prosecution to proceed on falsified documentation undermines the rule of law and erodes public confidence in the justice system. The judiciary must act decisively to correct and condemn such violations to maintain its legitimacy and moral authority. IV. Damages and Valuation of Harm The Defendant seeks restitution and damages commensurate with the magnitude of the constitutional violations and the systemic corruption exposed. The following categories of harm justify a valuation exceeding $2.5 billion USD, reflecting both compensatory and punitive damages: Loss of Liberty and Due Process ~ The unlawful deprivation of freedom and denial of judicial access. Reputational and Emotional Harm ~ Two decades of stigma, psychological trauma, and social isolation. Economic and Opportunity Loss ~ Destruction of career, income potential, and professional standing. Punitive Damages ~ To punish and deter future misconduct by state actors and institutions. Institutional Accountability ~ Damages for systemic corruption, falsification of public records, and erosion of public trust. Public Interest Damages ~ Compensation for the broader societal harm caused by the corruption of judicial integrity. This case represents not merely a personal injury, but a national constitutional breach — a precedent that, if left unpunished, endangers every citizen’s right to due process and equal protection under the law. V. Relief Sought The Defendant respectfully requests: Immediate dismissal of all charges with prejudice. Expungement of all falsified or altered records. Independent forensic audit of all arrest and court records associated with the Defendant. Referral to the Department of Justice Civil Rights Division for investigation into systemic misconduct. Award of compensatory and punitive damages totaling $2.5 billion USD, subject to adjustment upon discovery. Public acknowledgment of wrongdoing and formal correction of all judicial records. VI. Conclusion The Defendant stands as a sovereign American citizen whose rights were not merely violated but erased. The unlawful alteration of official records is not a clerical mistake. It is a constitutional crime. It is the theft of truth, the erasure of identity, and the corruption of the very system sworn to protect it. Justice demands not only dismissal but restitution, reform, and accountability. The Constitution cannot defend itself; it relies on citizens and courts of conscience to do so. This motion is not a plea for mercy . It is a demand for justice, truth, and the restoration of the rule of law. Respectfully submitted, Sign: ~ {Jeremy H. Hars} ~

Kristen K. Naros

Profile
Contact Attorney

Related

Testimonials

DETAILS

Press Releases

Newest Member

Matthew Trollinger

Recent Posts

Press Releases

Contact Us

Profile Contact Attorney jQuery(document).ready(function(){ jQuery("#contact-profile-owner-popup-button").colorbox({ inline:true, href:"#contact-owner-popup-form" }); });

Related

Address

Our Address:

Telephone:

Email:

Web:

Contact Attorney

Testimonials

DETAILS

Press Releases

Newest Member

Matthew Trollinger

Profile
Contact Attorney