William Schwitzer |

Profile
Contact Attorney

William Schwitzer is a recognized nationally as a top personal injury trial attorney. Mr. Schwitzer’s lawyering skills has resulted in over eight hundred million dollars in trial verdicts and pre-trial settlements. Do the research… not many trial attorneys in new york state have accomplished what William Schwitzer has accomplished in the court room. Mr. Schwitzer is recognized by the new york law journal’s top personal injury trial attorney, and top trial attorney in new york state by his peers. William Schwitzer is an attorney who doesn’t tell his clients what they want to hear rather, he gets them the results they deserve and what is realistically obtainable under the law. In the personal injury community… colleagues and other law firms look to William Schwitzer to handle their most serious and complex personal injury matters.

PARTNER LAW SCHOOL:
University of Connecticut
Graduated 1985, Western New England Law School, Springfield, Mass.

ADMITTED:
1985, New York State Bar
1985, Massachusetts State Bar

PROFESSIONAL ASSOC. AND MEMBERSHIPS:
American Trial Lawyers Association
New York State Trial Lawyers Association
American Bar Association

PRACTICE AREAS:
Construction Site Accidents
Complex Civil Litigation-Personal Injury
Medical Malpractice
Wrongful Death

PARTNER LAW SCHOOL:
University of Connecticut
Graduated 1985, Western New England Law School, Springfield, Mass.

ADMITTED:
1985, New York State Bar
1985, Massachusetts State Bar

PROFESSIONAL ASSOC. AND MEMBERSHIPS:
American Trial Lawyers Association
New York State Trial Lawyers Association
American Bar Association

PRACTICE AREAS:
Construction Site Accidents
Complex Civil Litigation-Personal Injury
Medical Malpractice
Wrongful Death

Mr. Schwitzer represents victims involved in construction accidents, motor vehicle accidents, aviation accidents, ferry boat accidents and victims who have suffered catastrophic injuries. Mr. Schwitzer is a highly recognized personal injury trial attorney obtaining top verdicts in New York State, for 2012 he obtained $11.6 million for a client injured in a motor vehicle accident. mr. schwitzer has settled several multi-million dollar pre-trial settlements for many clients involved in construction accidents such as $5.5 million for a painter, $5.3 million to name a few. as well as obtaining some top verdicts for client’s injured at construction sites; $10.8 million for a laborer, $8.9 million for a construction worker and $6.3 million for a laborer.

William Schwitzer has also received national recognition for obtaining a top-10 verdict of $37 million for an injured individual. Mr. Schwitzer’s passion for protecting the rights of injured people goes beyond the doors of the court room…every year he is nominated as a super lawyer by his peers for his lawyering skills and keen ability for being one of New York state’s top personal injury trial attorney.

“I take tremendous pride in my firm’s reputation for being one of the top personal injury law firms in New York state. As lead trial attorney and managing partner, I am humbled by my clients’ recognition that my office is a premier personal injury law firm. We have consistently recovered some of the largest awards in the state. I work diligently and take each case handled for our clients to heart… when I see the smiles of my clients because justice has been accomplished I know I did the very best for them…I feel blessed knowing that my hard work made a difference in their lives.”

Testimonials

Publishing ...

Your testimonial has been successfully sent

Please fill out all fields

DETAILS

1 CommentComment on Facebook

To the Honorable Court Comes now the Defendant, an American-born citizen, invoking the full protection of the United States Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and all applicable federal and state civil rights statutes. The Defendant respectfully moves this Court for immediate dismissal of all charges, full restitution, and the initiation of a federal inquiry into the unlawful alteration of arrest records ~ acts that constitute a direct assault on constitutional law, civil rights, and the integrity of the American justice system. I. Statement of Facts The Defendant’s arrest records were unlawfully altered, amended, or falsified on multiple occasions. Up to nine (9) separate instances ~ without judicial authorization, due process, or the Defendant’s knowledge or consent. These alterations occurred within official courthouse systems, representing a deliberate and systemic act of tampering with public records, a felony under both federal and state law. This misconduct deprived the Defendant of liberty, reputation, and due process, violating the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. Neither the Defendant nor counsel was ever permitted to appear before a judge. The entire judicial process was subverted, replaced by falsified documentation and administrative deceit. These actions were not clerical errors. They were calculated violations . A coordinated effort to manipulate the record, obstruct justice, and conceal misconduct. The Defendant asserts that this pattern of falsification constitutes a constitutional crisis, undermining the rule of law and eroding public trust in the judiciary. II. Constitutional and Statutory Violations A. Fourth Amendment The unlawful alteration of arrest records constitutes an unreasonable seizure of identity and liberty. By fabricating or distorting the factual basis of prior proceedings, state actors effectively seized the Defendant’s legal identity and replaced it with a false narrative, violating the right to be secure in person and record. B. Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments (Due Process and Equal Protection) The Defendant was denied procedural due process when records were altered without notice, hearing, or opportunity to contest. Equal protection was violated through selective and discriminatory treatment. These acts deprived the Defendant of the fundamental fairness guaranteed by the Constitution and created a two-tiered system of justice . One for the protected, and one for the silenced. C. Sixth Amendment The Defendant’s right to a fair trial and accurate recordkeeping was destroyed. Altered records directly affect defense strategy, credibility, and sentencing considerations. The falsification of judicial documents renders any subsequent proceedings constitutionally void. D. Civil Rights Statutes Under 42 U.S.C. §1983, any person acting under color of law who deprives another of constitutional rights is liable for damages. The Defendant reserves the right to pursue civil action against all responsible parties, including law enforcement agencies, clerks, prosecutors, and any third parties complicit in the falsification of records. Each alteration constitutes a separate and actionable violation of civil rights. III. Legal Argument for Dismissal and Restitution Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine Any evidence derived from falsified or altered records is inadmissible. The foundation of the prosecution’s case is therefore tainted and must be dismissed in its entirety. The doctrine mandates exclusion of all evidence obtained through unlawful means, ensuring that justice is not built upon corruption. Violation of Brady v. Maryland (373 U.S. 83, 1963) The suppression or alteration of exculpatory evidence constitutes prosecutorial misconduct and mandates dismissal. By concealing or distorting material facts, the prosecution deprived the Defendant of a fair opportunity to present a complete defense. Judicial Integrity and Public Trust The Court has an inherent duty to preserve the integrity of its records. Allowing prosecution to proceed on falsified documentation undermines the rule of law and erodes public confidence in the justice system. The judiciary must act decisively to correct and condemn such violations to maintain its legitimacy and moral authority. IV. Damages and Valuation of Harm The Defendant seeks restitution and damages commensurate with the magnitude of the constitutional violations and the systemic corruption exposed. The following categories of harm justify a valuation exceeding $2.5 billion USD, reflecting both compensatory and punitive damages: Loss of Liberty and Due Process ~ The unlawful deprivation of freedom and denial of judicial access. Reputational and Emotional Harm ~ Two decades of stigma, psychological trauma, and social isolation. Economic and Opportunity Loss ~ Destruction of career, income potential, and professional standing. Punitive Damages ~ To punish and deter future misconduct by state actors and institutions. Institutional Accountability ~ Damages for systemic corruption, falsification of public records, and erosion of public trust. Public Interest Damages ~ Compensation for the broader societal harm caused by the corruption of judicial integrity. This case represents not merely a personal injury, but a national constitutional breach — a precedent that, if left unpunished, endangers every citizen’s right to due process and equal protection under the law. V. Relief Sought The Defendant respectfully requests: Immediate dismissal of all charges with prejudice. Expungement of all falsified or altered records. Independent forensic audit of all arrest and court records associated with the Defendant. Referral to the Department of Justice Civil Rights Division for investigation into systemic misconduct. Award of compensatory and punitive damages totaling $2.5 billion USD, subject to adjustment upon discovery. Public acknowledgment of wrongdoing and formal correction of all judicial records. VI. Conclusion The Defendant stands as a sovereign American citizen whose rights were not merely violated but erased. The unlawful alteration of official records is not a clerical mistake. It is a constitutional crime. It is the theft of truth, the erasure of identity, and the corruption of the very system sworn to protect it. Justice demands not only dismissal but restitution, reform, and accountability. The Constitution cannot defend itself; it relies on citizens and courts of conscience to do so. This motion is not a plea for mercy . It is a demand for justice, truth, and the restoration of the rule of law. Respectfully submitted, Sign: ~ {Jeremy H. Hars} ~

William Schwitzer

Profile
Contact Attorney

Related

Testimonials

DETAILS

Press Releases

Newest Member

Matthew Trollinger

Recent Posts

Press Releases

Contact Us

Profile Contact Attorney jQuery(document).ready(function(){ jQuery("#contact-profile-owner-popup-button").colorbox({ inline:true, href:"#contact-owner-popup-form" }); });

Related

Address

Our Address:

Telephone:

Email:

Web:

Contact Attorney

Testimonials

DETAILS

Press Releases

Newest Member

Matthew Trollinger

Profile
Contact Attorney